It's time for another blog hop! Hurray!
First thing's first... I guess that there was a challenge that went with the last hop. I can't remember which posts I commented on, but I'm sure that it was more than five. However, here are some of the new blogs that I started to follow (in no particular order):
... and a few more too.
I chose to follow these wonderful bloggers because it looked like they were reading some interesting books and what they had to say struck me as interesting.
And now, the new question!
"If you find a book that looks interesting but is part of a series, do you always start with the first title?"
I really should, but sometimes I don't. For some books, that works; they could easily be stand-alone books. However, some books just don't quite work that way. They might refer to something that happened in another book before that-- something crucial. That's when I'll stop, go find the first one, and then work my way back to the first book I picked up.
When I was reading 'A Series of Unfortunate Events' I was a rebel, and I started with book 10, went back to 7 or 3... there was no rhyme or reason to how I read them. Then I read them all again, but in order. I'm not sure if one method did better than another.
Geez.... sorry for the long answer...
Any way, feel free to look around, and happy blog-hopping!
Thanks for reading!